Category Archives: Uncategorized

The Mindfulness Conundrum

In the mid-2000s, as an elementary school teacher at a private school in Washington DC, I wholeheartedly bought into the teaching of mindfulness.  As the world sped up around us, parents and teachers grappled with emotionally fraught events like school shootings and climate disasters, not knowing how our children would respond; how they would cope.  Could they cope?  How do we talk about the news?  How do we make sense of that which is senseless? 

Mindfulness seemed like a solid way to help children compartmentalize and separate themselves from what parents and teachers alike knew was too much for young minds to handle.  Mindfulness is a way to check in with one’s body.  To realize that in this current moment we are not in danger and we are not in pain.  To briefly scan ourselves physically and mentally.  To let ourselves know that we are alright. In addition to mindfulness, yoga culture has taught us to be present, to focus on our breath, to scan our bodies for tension.  These are all good lessons. 

The practice forces the mind to be in the present; to block out external stimulation and focus on the self.  To recognize and validate internal stimuli and to drive away negative thoughts from past or future events that have no bearing on the now.  To take each moment as it comes without prejudice.  To clean the slate and start anew. 

The practice also requires discipline and commitment.  It might seem trivial, but without commitment, it is not uncommon for one to feel silly and self indulgent.  To worry about what others might think.  Imagine, if you can, a classroom of fifth graders sitting in silence with eyes closed trying not to think about one another.  This scenario takes a lot of teacher preparation and conviction.  If teachers are not fully on board, the class has no chance.  It also requires teachers to be genuinely connected to their students.  Heart-felt conversations regarding the benefits of the practice and why it is important must be open and honest.  Only then will students trust that this strange activity is worth taking seriously. With regular practice and repetition even fifth graders can begin to see the benefits of being mindful.

Once mindfulness becomes a regular component of classroom life, it can be referenced when children are stressed.  Whether due to social anxieties or academic pressures, mindfulness can help children overcome discomfort and focus on moving towards resolution.  Whether this means forgiving or asking for forgiveness in social situations, or putting aside fear of failure in order to perform better in academic or sports related challenges, the result is the same- a more present, less distracted person ready to give their best. 

From a parent or teacher perspective this is the ideal.  Enable children to move past that which is petty, to focus on that which is truly important.  To cultivate deep impactful growth emotionally, socially, and academically. To foster relationships that are honest and healthy, and to move away from toxic emotions and interactions.

As a teacher who witnessed some of these benefits (I would be lying to say it fully worked all the time), I can realistically say that for a good portion of the students, mindfulness gave them a strategy for overcoming challenges that previously had been unaddressed.  A way for students to calm their minds before tests; to settle their nerves before performances; and to remove themselves from escalating social challenges. A way for students to gain perspective.

On the flip side of all of the benefits of mindfulness, are the outcomes of a more self-centered group.  As children become more adept at identifying and labeling their emotions, they become aware of what they need in order to engage in an activity.  Comments like, “I need a moment”, or “I need you to give me some space”, or “I need you to leave me alone” become common.  It’s also not uncommon to hear dueling “I needs” in heated social interactions.  

A playground interaction might go something like this:

“I need you to give me some space!”

“Well I need you to give me the ball!”

“I’m not giving you the ball, because I need to take my turn!”

“I just need you to play better!”

“I need you to shut up!”

While neither of these students is being mindful, they are certainly using the language of mindfulness to make the situation about them.

One important drawback of mindfulness is that it places focus on how an individual is feeling in any given situation.  This takes away focus on how others might feel.  In this way, mindfulness is in conflict with being thoughtful.  In this way, we have given tools to children to take care of themselves but not to take care of each other.

Fast forward to adulthood and the myriad different messages that people receive through media, whether social, network, or otherwise, create an environment where “different” is uncomfortable and therefore dangerous. It is not difficult to imagine how an uninformed and self-centered person might react in a situation they perceive to be uncomfortable.  This scenario is played out in universities and colleges where students faced with perspectives that differ from their own feel uncomfortable and perceive that discomfort as an affront to their safety.  “Your message makes me uncomfortable, therefore I need you to stop…” The idea that personal comfort is the highest priority is an unintended consequence of mindfulness.

Take the woman in central park who, for whatever reason, was terrified of black people.  When she came across a black man in the woods she “needed” him to go away so that she could feel safe.  Nevermind that he was a birdwatcher and had every right to be where he was, doing what he was doing.  He posed no threat to her whatsoever. She felt it necessary to call the police and have the threat removed.  Unfortunately for her, the police saw no problem with the man, a situation that in another time or place may have ended very differently. 

So, what is the solution to the mindfulness conundrum?  Thoughtfulness.  Being thoughtful means that an individual is concerned about the well-being of those around them.  While both mindfulness and thoughtfulness require an individual to be present in the moment, thoughtfulness requires the individual to think about how their actions and words might be interpreted by others.  To show concern for the safety and well-being of other people.  This is actually a huge shift from mindfulness.  It requires empathy and recognition that we are all in this together and that each of us has the right to be.  

While we do our best to teach compassion and thoughtfulness to children in schools, I believe that the mindfulness message echoed more loudly for those who needed it the least.  In other words, the tendency towards selfishness is more natural than the tendency for selflessness.  Those individuals who may have started out more focused on themselves really took the mindfulness lessons to heart and may have skipped the thoughtfulness aspects of school altogether.  I think about people that are drawn to ambitious pursuits such as business or politics.  Those individuals may be more susceptible to corruption in the guise of mindfulness.  It is not a huge leap to go from “I need some space” to “I need a new car…” or “I need you to do my bidding…”.

Thoughtfulness at the expense of the self, is not the goal. In fact, we need a blend of both mindfulness and thoughtfulness.  Some situations require more or less of each.  Ultimately, though, for society to function effectively, people need to err on the side of thoughtfulness.  To be compassionate.  To care for and about other people. 

I view mindfulness and thoughtfulness as opposing forces that need to remain in balance, like the bicep muscle and the tricep muscle; one pulls and the other pushes.  To be a good writer, one must read…a lot.  Pulling and pushing.  For a time in the mid 2000s, I believe we overworked the mindfulness muscle causing it to grow beyond the ability of the thoughtfulness muscle to pull it back.  I think it is time for us to begin flexing our thoughtfulness muscles a little more.

Closed-minded Children?

Are you an open-minded person?  How do you know?  I don’t know anyone who would admit to being closed-minded, but the law of averages would suggest that those people are out there.  You probably know a couple.  You might be one.  I might be one.

To have an open mind is to be self aware enough to know when you don’t know.  To admit to one’s self that there might be other perspectives yet to be considered.

Certainly, a mind is not either open or closed.  There are things for which I have made up my mind, and others where I might accept some discussion.  I think the question is more about how one approaches the world.  Do you tend to be a skeptic, or do you gaze upon the world in wonder.

I only ask these questions because recently it occurred to me that many of the things that parents and teachers do, encourage the closing of the mind.  We want our children to make decisions without all of the data.  We forget that children haven’t had that much experience being people yet, and we ask them questions like, “what do you want to be when you grow up?”  Knowing full well that they can’t possibly know all of the options, we ask them, “what is your favorite movie, or song, or even color.”    Questions like these only serve to end debate; to close discussion.

As adults we know that life is not a destination, but rather how we spend our time.  The experiences we accumulate broaden our perspectives and make us much more interesting to be around.   Knowing this, we can design our questions to focus on what is not yet known; and how grand it is when new information is gained.

“Did you know there are people whose job it is to inspect wind turbines?”  or “I wonder how many different jobs are involved in manufacturing an iPad?”  Rather than asking a child’s favorite flavor of ice cream, ask “what is the most interesting place you’ve ever eaten ice cream?”  or “what flavor of ice cream do you hope to never have to eat!”  OK, that one might be a little closed-minded.

The point is, (I think) that we frequently force binary conditions on children’s thinking.  It either is, or it isn’t.  You either know the answer or you don’t.  This puts a lot of emphasis on knowing, which is a closed-minded state, rather than learning, which is an open-minded state.   Standardized tests are designed to take a closed-minded snapshot of an individual at a specific moment.  There is certainly a time when this can be useful.  It is important, however, to remember to also evaluate one’s process for learning.  I think the process is far more valuable than either knowing or not.

But I’m open for discussion.

 

 

Student Satisfaction

As I conducted research for my paper, Assessing Students Through Distance Education, I came across an interesting situation.  While several studies found that there was no significant difference in achievement between face to face (f2f) participants and their online counterparts, there was a significant difference in the satisfaction of the two groups.  Multiple studies found, as an aside, that online students were less satisfied with their learning experience than those who met f2f.  This certainly could be attributed to the fact that the participants in the studies were experiencing online classes for the first time and thus were coping with change.  Or, it could also be that online classes truly offer a less pleasant experience than the personal f2f option (for the same tuition dollars, I might add.)
In my own experience, I find this to be true.  This term I am taking my first online courses (2 + the required Introduction to Graduate Studies.)  I am definitely working hard, and yes learning, but I don’t feel connected.  I have posted to the discussions, and responded to others’ posts, but I don’t know anyone, and I’m certain that no one knows me.  Obviously being known is not one of the course objectives, but it has always been a part of my educational experience.
Perhaps this blog assignment will help our class get to know one another a little better.  But looking back over this blog post, I find nothing funny, and well, that’s just not me.  Seriously 😉

Is Higher Education Really the Last to Change?

It is my belief that the purpose of the blogging assignment is for students in the OMDE 603 course to have an avenue to express their personal beliefs or ideas, or try out newly formed thoughts (of which, this is one!)  So I’d like to go out on a limb, so to speak, and talk about an idea I’ve been noodling.  I would love to hear everyone’s thoughts on this , especially your’s, Dr. Eli.

I was just offered, and subsequently accepted a position, as an Instructional Technologist at a small liberal arts college.  During the interview process I had an extremely enlightening and somewhat concerning conversation with the chief information officer of the college.  He explained a situation, that I suspect is common in colleges and universities throughout the country, that kind of surprised me.  That is that, college Instructional Technology departments are pushing educational pedagogy on the professors.  Many colleges reward professors for publication.  In fact, for a lot of colleges, the single most important factor in being awarded tenure, is how many times a professor has been published or to what extent they have gained notoriety through their publications.  They are simply not rewarded for solid teaching.  At the same time, colleges are tasking their educational technology departments with convincing professors to utilize more technology with their students in pedagogically sounds ways.  In other words, solid educational pedagogy is coming from the technology departments.  In fact, many schools are staffing their instructional technology departments with professionals who started their careers in K-12 educational jobs.

As I said, this is just something I am noodling, and I’m certain that there are multiple perspectives that I am lacking, but I am certainly surprised by this so far.  Gaining perspective is always my prime initiative, so if you have some to give, I would love to hear it.

Chapter 6: Technologies of Online Learning (E-Learning) (from 3/18/14)

As I read through the chapter on the technologies of online learning (Elliott and McGreal) I am encouraged by the advances discussed.  Most of the things that bother me about distance education thus far, are being addressed by new multimedia technologies.  Things like web conferencing, streaming audio and video, and metaverses, or online worlds, are bridging the gaps between f2f learning and DE.  The more instructors are able to recreate the physical learning environment, the smaller the gap, or distance, if you will, in education.  I am beginning to see where future generations of students will prefer the distance model, and those of us who started in f2f environments will just have to adjust.  I’m game.

Similarities and Differences in f2f vs. DE (from 3/22/14)

As I am differentiating the role of the instructor in f2f courses versus DE courses something occurred to me. We frequently refer to today’s students as “technology natives.”  In other words, students today have grown up with technology.  I have a niece in Ghana with whom I Skype regularly.  She is growing up with the idea that people on the screen recognize you and speak to you.  Her experience with technology is very different than my own (as a person in his 40’s.)  It is difficult for me to understand what it is like for her.  By the same reasoning, the majority of DE instructors currently facilitating online instruction probably grew up with a more traditional educational background.  In other words, there are probably not that many professors out there who received their degrees through DE courses.  I think that DE instructors should have to take courses online so they can more closely empathize with the student’s experience.  Kind of the same thing as police officers who have to be tazered in order to carry a tazer gun (well, sort of.)

New Beginnings (from 7/11/14)

Starting anew is difficult.  I’ve heard mention of things like bravery and courage.  The truth is, it really just takes effort.  You have to get up and do it.  I suppose there is some element of courage involved in having to prove oneself all over again; to learn new systems and try not to look like a fool. But looking like a fool has never really frightened me.  Granted, in some situations I will do absolutely everything possible in order not to look like a fool.  But let’s face it, if you are like me, and hopefully you are not, that’s usually unavoidable. Embrace foolishness.  Once you are out there, it really doesn’t hurt that much, and you get used to it.  If we look back in hindsight, I think most of us realize that much of what we do is foolish anyhow.

How often have you heard people say they can’t stand hearing themselves on recordings or watching themselves on video? They say “that’s not what I sound like…” and usually all I can think is, actually, that’s exactly what you sound like.  But that somehow seems mean.  Like saying, “you think you’re a dork, and actually, you are.”  I think, however, that watching yourself on video in an authentic situation (rather than scripted or contrived) is the ultimate in reflection.

Last school year, I asked my co-teacher to video tape me while I taught a writing lesson.  The point was to reflect on myself as an instructor.  My first reaction to the video was the typical, “that ain’t me…” kind of thinking.  So I watched it carefully and with intent.  At first I didn’t like the guy I saw teaching the lesson.  He seemed…stiff, and kind of mean. His voice was annoying and he was out of shape.  I didn’t think I’d like hanging out with that guy.   Then I watched the students watching him.  They were engaged in the lesson. That was good.  They were listening to what he had to say… also good.  It appeared as though they liked the guy talking.  I heard laughter at the right moments, and saw smiles. So, I embraced that guy.  I accepted that he is the way I am.  Then I used that knowledge to reflect on how to make him more the way I want to be.  I don’t know if I have had any affect on him because I haven’t video taped him, or…myself, since then.  The point is, I think, that if you know what you are “like,” then you don’t worry that much about looking like a fool.  You just know it to be the way it is.

What does that have to do with starting anew?  Well, not much, other than the ability to suppress the urge to avoid looking like a fool.  It has a lot to do with being honest with oneself, which for some reason is something  a lot of people struggle with. Starting anew gives one the opportunity to think about that person in the video, and make him more like the you in your head, without anyone asking if you are feeling ok.  That, or you could do what I did…just embrace looking like a fool.